« Stripped Bare | Main | Subdivisions »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8354704f253ef011570eea36d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reach:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Tim Siedell
Categories
- Advertising
- Architecture
- Art/Photography
- Books
- Branding
- Creative Ideas
- Creative Inspiration
- Creative Masters
- Design
- Enhancing Creativity
- Funny
- Humor
- Interactive
- Interesting/Trivial
- Marketing
- Media
- Movies
- Poetry/Writing
- Random Thoughts
- Street Art
- Thought Provoking
- Video
- Vintage Advertising
- Vintage Design
- Vintage Illustration
- Vintage Photography
- Viral Advertising
- Web 2.0
- Web/Tech
Recent Comments
- Ghost9 on Three Times A Day
- T99 on Vintage Animal Science Wall Charts
- artchick1.blogspot.com on The Long Barn Studio
- Nicola Thompson on Broken Things
- heather on Broken Things
- Chris on Pixelized Rococo Furniture
- Jamie V on Three Times A Day
- Greeneyezz ZZ on Broken Things
- Angus on Broken Things
- Sloane Mann on Three Times A Day
I'm going with clever. Basically because once I figured it out, I felt REALLY smart. ;)
Posted by: Kymber | June 10, 2009 at 03:49 PM
Clever, for sure.
Posted by: Bryce | June 10, 2009 at 04:04 PM
It looks beautiful and I think it's clever but at a quick glance no one is going to get it.
Posted by: C _ _ D | June 10, 2009 at 05:11 PM
I didn't get it at first, but when I figured it out I liked it a lot.
Posted by: Chris | June 10, 2009 at 06:19 PM
It's tooo clever for an effective ads.
Posted by: Rachel | June 10, 2009 at 08:22 PM
LIke everyone else, clever once it's figured out, but to be an effective ad, I think most people will skip right over it. Nobody takes the time to sit and figure out a print ad in a magazine.
Posted by: JB | June 11, 2009 at 07:50 AM
Too understated...and the headline is clumsy.
Posted by: Meg Hoppe | June 11, 2009 at 08:01 AM
well...i am thick...i don't get it...so I moved on... but maybe I am not the target market
Posted by: Roland Hanekroot | June 11, 2009 at 07:53 PM
Clever. I like it.
Posted by: r | June 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM
It is clever, once you get it (and it took me a while). I think for an ad that is that minimalist, you need it to be a bit more obvious though.
Posted by: Livvey K | June 16, 2009 at 05:52 PM
got it immediately, like it.
Posted by: hamish | June 24, 2009 at 08:59 PM
Terrific - I got it right away and think they are very well done.
Posted by: Opinion Farla | June 28, 2009 at 08:04 PM